Environmental Personhood: A New Approach to Protecting Nature
"When we recognize the personhood of nature, we acknowledge our deep, inextricable connection to the earth, not as its masters, but as its stewards, bound by a shared responsibility."
BYOS.ONE
In recent years, the concept of environmental personhood has gained significant attention as a way to protect ecosystems by granting them legal rights.
From rivers to national parks, some of the world’s most vital natural resources have been recognized as legal entities, with the same protections as individuals. This emerging legal framework acknowledges that humans are not the only entities deserving of legal recognition and protection – our environment must also have a voice in the courtroom.
Real-World Examples of Environmental Personhood
1. The Whanganui River, New Zealand
One of the most prominent examples of environmental personhood is the recognition of the Whanganui River as a legal entity in 2017. In New Zealand, the river was granted the legal status of Te Awa Tupua, which means it is "a living entity" with its own rights. This decision was deeply rooted in the cultural connection of the local iwi (tribes) and hapū (sub-tribes), who consider the river a sacred ancestor. This move not only aimed at protecting the river’s ecological health but also acknowledged the spiritual and historical ties that the local Māori people have with the land.
The recognition of the river’s personhood reflects a profound sense of inalienable connection between people and nature. It ensures that the river can be represented in court, and its well-being is legally protected. The law also mandates a co-governance structure, where both Māori representatives and the New Zealand government jointly oversee the river’s interests.
2. Mar Menor, Spain
In Spain, the Mar Menor, Europe’s largest saltwater lagoon, has also been granted legal personhood. The lagoon has suffered extensive damage due to agricultural runoff, pollution, and urban development. In response, local environmental groups and legal activists pushed for the lagoon to be recognized as a legal person to safeguard its future.
In 2025, the Mar Menor was declared the first European ecosystem to hold such status, which ensures its protection and allows it to take legal action against polluters. This move brings attention to the fact that environmental destruction isn’t just a local issue but a global one that needs urgent attention.
3. Te Urewera National Park, New Zealand
New Zealand has also set a precedent with its Te Urewera National Park, which was declared a legal entity under the name Te Urewera in 2014. This move granted the park the status of a legal person, recognizing its ecological value and ensuring that any decisions made about the land’s management are in its best interest.
4. The Ganges and Yamuna Rivers, India
In India, both the Ganges and Yamuna Rivers were granted personhood status in 2017, aiming to combat pollution and promote sustainable development. The Supreme Court ruled that these sacred rivers had the rights of legal persons, effectively making them ‘protected entities’ under Indian law. This decision was driven by the overwhelming pollution facing these waterways, which have long been central to the lives of millions of people in India.
Arguments For and Against Environmental Personhood
Arguments For:
Legal Protection for Nature: Granting legal personhood to environmental entities ensures that ecosystems have the same legal protections as humans. It provides a clear legal avenue for defending the natural world against exploitation, pollution, and destruction.
Cultural Significance: In many cultures, certain natural features, like rivers and forests, are considered sacred. Legal personhood recognizes this cultural significance and enforces the respect that these ecosystems deserve.
Improved Accountability: With legal rights, ecosystems can take legal action against polluters or developers, making it harder for destructive practices to continue unchecked.
Arguments Against:
Practical Challenges: Granting personhood to nature could create legal complications, such as who represents the ecosystem in court. Who is responsible for the legal fees and court cases if the ecosystem is harmed?
Economic Concerns: Some argue that the legal status of natural entities could hinder development and economic activities. The restrictions placed on land and water use for the benefit of ecosystems may negatively impact industries such as agriculture, mining, or tourism.
Enforcement Issues: Even if legal personhood is granted, ensuring enforcement of the law could be challenging, especially in developing regions where legal systems may be weak.
A New Path for Environmental Protection?
The debate over environmental personhood is an important one as we continue to face the climate crisis. By recognizing the rights of ecosystems, we may be able to create a legal framework that prioritizes the preservation of nature. While the concept is not without its challenges, it provides an innovative approach to safeguarding our planet for future generations.
For further reading on the legal aspects and global implications of environmental personhood, check out the Antarctic Treaty System for another example of international agreements aimed at protecting ecosystems.
““Let’s go beyond limits. Let’s build what the world doesn’t know it needs yet.””
